'If you say English wickets don't take spin in April, I want to prove you wrong'

The Essex, and former South Africa, offspinner talks about his glorious 2019 and looks ahead to his future

Interview by Alan Gardner14-Apr-2020 How are you going during lockdown?
It’s been okay so far – started off a bit slowly. It’s quite easy to get into bad habits, and so the first couple of days was a bit like holiday. And then luckily I’ve got [Essex captain] Tom Westley living up the road. We’ve got a social-distancing running club. We go normally at about lunchtime, for about a 5-6km run. And I’ve picked up some weights from the ground, so I’m managing to try and keep the strength work up as well.So yeah, between that and an online short course that I’m doing, lockdown has been relatively productive, but the novelty has definitely worn off. I’m looking forward to getting my freedom back at some stage.Let’s go back over your 2019 season: you were the leading Championship wicket-taker, helped Essex to another four-day title, and captained the team to success in the T20 Blast. A pretty good summer, in other words?
It was. The County Championship was a little bit more predictable. Somerset really ran away with it, [while] we started off quite slowly, losing to Hampshire in the first game. We were kind of chasing our tails from then onwards because Somerset had got off to such a good start. But we knew we had to play them twice, and if we kept on winning, which we were doing at Chelmsford, and finding ways to win away from home. We knew that if we beat them twice, then we could quite possibly catch them.

“I’m quite a passionate and intense person. Especially when it comes to a competitive environment. I expect a lot – sometimes I think I expect too much”

It turned out that they faltered at the second-last hurdle, down at the Rose Bowl, so it opened the door for us. And then yeah, we always knew that weather was going to play an issue [in the final game]. We always knew that the wicket was going to be a result wicket. So yeah, everything panned out, the weather played its part. Looking back on it now, it was an extremely special season.I think what served us well was, we found ways to outscore opposition at Chelmsford. We all knew that Chelmsford wasn’t the batters’ paradise of yesteryear, but with guys like Alastair Cook and Dan Lawrence and Ravi Bopara in the middle order, we always found ways to score runs. That was the most important thing for us. And then playing at home with the turning ball, it was always fun bowling there, and being assisted by Jamie Porter. Aaron Beard really came through during the season, Sam Cook has become a stalwart of the four-day team. So it was a really good collective effort.The T20 stuff – we were absolutely horrendous at the beginning of the competition, couldn’t string consistent performances together. And it came down to Glamorgan needing to beat Hampshire, and I think Glamorgan’s record was zero from 21 or something ridiculous [16 games without a win]. And Hampshire had been playing really good T20 cricket. So we were pushing the proverbial turd uphill, if I can put it like that. But the stars aligned, we managed to beat Kent at home and Glamorgan beat Hampshire and we were through to the playoffs. I think from there we earned our place.I don’t think Finals Day could have gone any better than it did. So, yeah, it was pretty special being able to lead the team and to lift the trophy. Incredibly special. The club had never won the T20 trophy before.Harmer on Essex’s County Championship title-winning match: “[Somerset] knew the only way they were going to beat us was to prepare a wicket that would only last two days. They paid the price for that”•Getty ImagesIt was your first year as T20 captain. What did you learn about yourself and the team?
That’s a good question. I’m quite a passionate and intense person. Especially when it comes to a competitive environment. I expect a lot – sometimes I think I expect too much. So at the beginning of the tournament, there was probably too much intensity from my part. And as the tournament progressed and we were losing, I started to realise that I couldn’t control everything and I had to trust the guys and understand that everybody’s trying their best and we needed to just find ways to string together good performances and free the players up.Get away from the fear of failure, and understand that T20 cricket is for entertainment purposes. So looking to take wickets versus trying to not get hit for boundaries, and as batters, looking to take the positive option. If you’re unsure, go for the positive option. If you get out doing that, there’s going to be no hard feelings. The same as a bowler – if you get hit for a boundary trying to take a wicket, provided it’s at the right time, not, say, the last ball of an over.We identified the first six overs [as a time] to strike and take wickets. It really opens up the middle period for myself, [Adam] Zampa and Ravi to try and operate in there. That’s where we got it wrong at the beginning of the tournament. We were too defensive playing at Chelmsford, a small ground, trying to defend the whole time and as a captain, I got it wrong there. Once we started to look to play more aggressively, look to take wickets, look to score runs, it really freed the guys up and allowed them to express themselves.You also made some hard decisions, such as dropping Varun Chopra and moving Ravi Bopara down the order into an unaccustomed finisher’s role
Yeah, there were some tough conversations. Varun Chopra and Ravi fell out of contention. We felt like it was the right move having Ravi at six, but he obviously felt differently. I think it was quite well publicised that he wanted to bat higher up in the order. But for me the decision was always about: where is Ravi best for the team? And in my opinion, finishing an innings, coming in when there’s 30 balls left in a game, that’s when he is the most dangerous – in the top three or four batters in the world [at] that.

“It would have been easy for me to just roll into Essex, understand that the standard wasn’t going to be international cricket and I could just coast along, but I wanted to try and make the most of my talent”

The first four games didn’t really work for us. We couldn’t string any performances together and we felt like we needed to make the change. Same as Chops at the top of the order. We felt like we needed a bit more explosiveness and risk-taking, so we decided to tweak the batting order a little bit. It was never the idea that they would stay out of the team for the entire tournament, but we felt we needed to make some changes and bring in some fresh ideas.It was difficult having those conversations and trying to explain to those players, two guys that I feel like I get along really well with, but I guess that’s part and parcel of the captaincy role. The relationships that you have personally and the relationships that you have within a cricket team are different. I think it’s quite important to be able to distinguish that. If I think you’re not doing a job on a cricket field, it doesn’t therefore mean that I think differently of you away from the cricket field. So that was probably a bit of a learning experience, being able to separate those two things and still maintain the relationships off the field.On Finals Day, you had figures of 4 for 19 and 3 for 16, and then hit the winning runs. Another special moment?
It couldn’t have gone any better. Obviously we were excited to be at Finals Day but I didn’t want our attitude to just be that we were happy to be there. The way it worked out, it played into our hands perfectly. The wicket was extremely slow, which suited our bowling – myself, Aron Nijjar, Ravi, and we also had Cameron Delport, who had done an extremely good job for us up the order opening the batting and also was able to turn his turn his arm over and take wickets. Having guys like that in your team on a slow wicket was massive for us. And yeah, I managed to pick up some wickets, which was really nice because throughout the tournament it had always been maybe one – two if I was lucky. To get three and four wickets in the semi-final and final when we needed it was extremely rewarding.There has been a lot of talk in England recently about how difficult it is to produce spinners, with the Championship played in April and September in seam-friendly conditions. What has been your experience?
I think I’ve always enjoyed the challenge. So if somebody tells me that the wickets are green in April and you don’t really bowl a lot of spin, I want to prove you wrong. I’ve had to prove people wrong throughout my career, and I think hearing things like that as well, as an offspinner, that’s what I do. That’s my job. I’m going to try and show you that we can change perceptions and strategies.I’ve always enjoyed bowling a lot and finding ways to make things work. Chelmsford starts turning earlier than most grounds. Come the end of May, beginning of June, it’s probably more like end of July beginning of August [at other grounds]. So it has helped me a lot. The trust that Ryan ten Doeschate put in me, by giving me the opportunity to bowl quite early on – in 2017 I’d bowl a couple of overs before lunch and then start bowling after the seamers had had to go off after lunch. I think as he trusted me more and as he saw what I was all about, he started to introduce me into the game a lot earlier, which is obviously not what batters are expecting, especially in England when the ball’s nipping and swinging. I think from a captaincy perspective, Tendo bringing me into the game earlier and helped me a lot.Since your Essex debut, you have taken more first-class wickets than anyone else in the world (291 at 22.12, 74 more than the next best). Have you thrived on the extra responsibility?
I stepped away from international cricket, came over to the UK as a Kolpak. So I felt that I still needed to prove to myself that I was good enough. It would have been easy for me to just roll into Essex, understand that the standard wasn’t going to be international cricket and I could just coast along, but I wanted to try and make the most of my talent. At the end of my career when I look back, as long as I can be the best version of Simon Harmer, that’s the most important thing for me.So coming over and looking for challenges, looking for ways to be better, looking for ways to perform and help Essex win more games. They had just been promoted from Division Two into Division One. The media-day chat in 2017 was all about whether or not Essex would be able to stay up or be relegated again. So yeah, I really enjoyed the challenge of county cricket. I’d followed it as a youngster. It’s very traditional still in England. You get 2500 people down to Chelmsford, which is a 6500-seater stadium. I really enjoyed the challenge, and getting the opportunity which I was looking for when I came over. Essex gave me the platform to showcase my skills and my talent.Talking of spinning pitches – what did you think of the surface Somerset prepared for last season’s title decider?
Well, it’s public knowledge that the wickets at Taunton normally turn, normally produce results. So we knew with weather imminent and going to play a part that the wicket was going to be a result wicket. The groundsman was standing on the edge of the square and when Somerset won the toss, he gave a massive celebration, fist pumping, jumping up and down. There were grooves in the wicket at a 45-degree angle about a quarter of an inch deep, and that was the most surprising thing for me. But I don’t want to get myself into trouble. [The ECB] rated it “poor”, they got a 24-point deduction, 12 of which were suspended. It could be a completely different kettle of fish at Taunton this year, but for the last game, I think they knew that was the only way they were going to beat us, preparing a wicket that would only last two days. So they paid the price for that and we ended up winning the trophy at Taunton, which was that much sweeter.

“I’ve always enjoyed a challenge and getting into a fight when I’m bowling. I think the competition is what fuels my competitiveness, my drive, my desire”

You played for South Africa in 2015 but were dropped after five Tests. Do you think you were unfairly written off in some quarters?
Professional sports is about opportunity and about being in the right place at the right time. I was lucky in the fact that I made my debut for South Africa, because Robin Peterson had stitches in his finger, Imran Tahir came in for the Port Elizabeth Test, and I was in the right place at the right time [in Cape Town] and made my debut.Now on the other end of the scale, getting dropped after five Test matches, two of which were in Bangladesh, which were rained out – so effectively three Test matches. But we had a pretty poor series, to put it lightly, on the 2015 tour to India and there were always going to be casualties. Unfortunately that’s professional cricket.I would have liked a bit more opportunity but perhaps that’s still going to come in international cricket – or not, I’m not sure. But Keshav Maharaj has done well, and taken his opportunity with both hands. So I’ve just got to work harder and if the opportunity presents itself one day, make sure that I’m better prepared than I was in 2015.Do you feel you need to play international cricket again to underline the point about how good a player you are?
I think it’s more about the level at which I compete. I’ve played three years of county cricket now and as a natural competitive sportsman, I’m itching for the next challenge. If it’s not going to be international cricket, I need to start challenging myself in terms of T20 cricket. So I then need to work on my skill set as an orthodox offspinner, who doesn’t normally play an integral role in T20 cricket. I need to find ways for me to be the bowler that a team relies on in order to take wickets. If it going to be international cricket to then compete on that stage, and to prove to myself that I am good enough to play international cricket. But if it doesn’t happen, then that’s the way the cookie crumbles. Unfortunately it’s not something in my control – whether Brexit happens at the end of the year, whether the UK leaves with or without a deal is going to play a role in whether or not I then become an overseas player or if I stay a Kolpak player. So there’s a lot of if, buts and maybes. I’ve just got to make sure that I’m on top of my game and finding ways to get better each and every season.Harmer took five wickets in the Mohali Test of 2015, and another five in the Nagpur match that followed. But that was his last Test•BCCIDo you look at spinners like R Ashwin and Nathan Lyon, see what they’re doing in Test cricket, and think, “I could do those things”?
I don’t think “I can do that as well”. It’s more, I want to see: can I do that? Can I rock up on day five at the MCG and spin a team out? Or am I not good enough to do that? Am I good enough to take wickets in India? I’ve tried it once and failed. Can I deal with the pressures of international cricket? It’s more about that, more unanswered questions versus looking at Lyon and being, “Oh, I can do that.” It’s not that at all.I think I was just happy to be there, when I made my debut in 2015. It was international cricket, everything I aspired to, all my dreams, all my goals, they’ve been accomplished, and I didn’t then reset the goalposts of where I wanted to go. Richie McCaw, in his documentary , speaks about how he had all these goals up until becoming an All Black, and then once he became an All Black, what then? He wanted to be the greatest All Black of all time. I think I could have been more proactive and better than having these goals to play for South Africa, to make my debut in international cricket… and then not resetting my goals once I got there. It’s something that I could have done better and it’s something I feel I’d be better prepared for now, whether or not the opportunity comes. It’s my own fault if it doesn’t.What do you think you’ve learned as an orthodox offspinner in the time since you played for South Africa?
It’s been learning how to adapt in certain situations and finding ways to take wickets when the conditions aren’t in your favour. Dealing with success, dealing with failure. Not worrying about what’s going on around you, not worrying about who’s taking wickets or what everybody else is doing. Focusing all my energy on myself and finding ways for me to get better. There’s been a lot on the field and off the field that I’ve learned over the last few years, but it’s probably the stuff that I’ve learned off the field that’s helped me the most.You bowled seam-up until turning to spin as a teenager. Have you retained that attacking instinct?
Yeah, I’ve always enjoyed a challenge and getting into a fight when I’m bowling. I think the competition is what fuels my competitiveness, my drive, my desire. That’s always been something that I’ve tried to do – get involved in a scrap. And I think it brings the best out of me.

“If I think you’re not doing a job on a cricket field, it doesn’t therefore mean that I think differently of you away from the cricket field”

What are the technical differences between bowling spin with a red ball and with a white ball?
The biggest thing is being able to nail your skills under pressure. As an orthodox offspinner, you need to be able to nail a yorker, you need to be able to bowl a ball that doesn’t turn. You need to be able to read a batter and understand when they’re going to be looking to take you on. Normally as an offspinner, from the first ball you bowl, the batter has already decided that they’re going to take you down. So it’s then trying to find ways to get the ball to turn away from the batter, and disguising it as well as you can. Whether that be a carrom ball or a conventional legspinner, undercutter, whatever it is that works for you. It’s finding ways to add that to your arsenal and being at the top of your run and being able to say, “Okay, I’m going to bowl a carrom ball” and knowing exactly where it’s going to land. Because it doesn’t help that you can bowl it but you’re too nervous to bowl it in a game or you bowl it halfway down the wicket. So I think that’s the biggest skill in terms of T20. Obviously, there’s a lot of technical aspects that go into bowling a carrom ball, bowling a legspinner, whatever it may be, but it’s being comfortable in that skill that you can then implement it in a game when you really need it.That’s very different to red-ball bowling, which is all about repetition and subtle changes.
Yeah, absolutely. In terms of four-day cricket, you need to be as consistent over a long period of time as you can be, and looking to keep the batsman at one end. And if you can bowl six balls at a batter, you can put a lot more pressure on him than if he’s getting two singles an over and getting off strike. They are two very different disciplines but each one brings positives and negatives.You’ve mentioned Brexit. Your contract with Essex runs until 2022. What does it say about the situation where Kolpak qualifications are rescinded?
I agreed terms with Essex that if the UK leaves without a deal at the end of the year, for the last two years of my contract I would then be an overseas player for Essex.And could that open the door to playing for South Africa again?
There haven’t been any discussions from Cricket South Africa’s side, proactive discussions, about what would happen. And I don’t know how happy Essex would be if there was a three-month tour during the English summer, to just release me and be like, yep, no worries, you can go. My main responsibility lies for the foreseeable future with Essex. I came over here for the opportunity, and the security that county cricket brings, so there would need to be a lot of discussions between Cricket South Africa about what they were willing to put on the table before I would consider that option, but it’s still a long way off yet and a lot can change.What about playing for England? Is that still a possibility?
I think it started in the press, with people who didn’t really know what the implications were or how it all worked saying that I’d become England-qualified in 2020. Or can we get him involved? I think it’s all talk. The way that the visas are structured at the moment, the power lies with the ECB. All the Kolpak players are currently on a tier-five visa, which means that you would have to be in the UK for ten years before you could apply for indefinite leave to remain. There is the possibility of moving to a tier two-visa but the ECB doesn’t want to explore that, even though all the counties have a licence to issue tier-two visas. There’s still discussions between some of the counties and players and the ECB to try and move the Kolpak players to a tier two.My immediate need for that would be in order for me to buy property. The banks won’t give me a mortgage because I don’t have indefinite leave to remain, so I can’t buy property in the UK. I can’t do any other form of work in the UK. I can only play county cricket, I can’t play club cricket. I can’t do any coaching. And my girlfriend’s on a visitor’s visa, so she can be in the UK for a maximum six out of the 12 months of the year, which obviously poses its problems. There’s a lot of reasons that I would want to move to a tier-two visa.I think English cricket has given me the opportunity to become a better person and a better player. So I would ultimately like to get a British passport and be naturalised in the UK, especially for my future family. But there’s a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of dead ends at the moment. In terms of playing for England, as far as I’m aware, that’s off the table for the foreseeable future.You were in South Africa during the southern summer, playing in the Mzansi Super League. Did you follow the upheaval at CSA?
Yeah, I think they are starting to move in the right direction, in my opinion. I think Graeme Smith has a lot of experience and having him in a director of cricket role, being the bridge between the players and the board, is a smart decision from Cricket South Africa. And it’s the same with Mark Boucher. He’s got a lot of experience in international cricket, somebody that the players would have the highest level of respect for, and when he speaks about situations or game scenarios, he speaks with international cricketing experience. We know that international cricketers don’t necessarily make good coaches, but it’s a hell of a good starting point, and especially with a young group of players, which South Africa has at the moment. Getting those players to buy in and to trust somebody, I think it’s a lot easier when you’ve got somebody like Mark Boucher at the helm.

“The biggest thing is being able to nail your skills under pressure. Being comfortable enough in that skill that you can implement it in a game when you really need it”

Given there has been a lot of player turnover, retirements and so on, would South Africa benefit from having some of the Kolpak players return?
I think when you are blooding new players, there’s always an element of experience and youth. I’m 31, I’ve played a lot of cricket, but I haven’t necessarily played a lot of international cricket. I think somebody like Kyle Abbott has been around the block – he’s played in T20 leagues around the world, he’s played more than a fair amount of international cricket. So I can’t see how it would be detrimental to have guys like that in your set-up. But there’s a lot of bad blood towards the Kolpaks, and it would take South Africans and perhaps Cricket South Africa to swallow their pride and seek for those players to return. There’s been a lot said in the press about the return of Kolpak players, but the public perception still is not great.I can’t really speak for all of them. I don’t know what their feeling is in terms of playing for South Africa again. But if the Kolpak situation is taken away, then I’m pretty sure there’ll be a few more players putting their hands up for selection in South Africa.Finally, what are you hoping for from the English summer, once the coronavirus restrictions lift?
Any cricket to start off with would be great. From there, I’d really like to play in the Hundred. It’s a new tournament and I felt like I did well to get picked up in it. With the change of rules that could potentially come in at the end of the year, it could quite possibly be my only opportunity to play in it. Being a Kolpak, I qualify as a local player. If that was taken away, I would then be an overseas player. So yeah, it would be extremely disappointing if it didn’t go ahead.I don’t really see the point of having [the County Championship, curtailed] – unless you’re going to play seven or eight Championship games, so that you can play everybody once. But I think if you’re playing four or five games, it’s not really a true reflection and you’re probably better suited to playing a regional tournament, just among the sort of London and south of England clubs or whatever it may be. But all of the cricketers at the moment are just hoping for any cricket.In the meantime, you have a law degree that you are aiming to finish at some point.
I’ve registered through Open University, but it can only start in September because of the way the academic year runs. So I’m busy doing an eight-week course through the University of Cape Town in property development and investment. That’s been keeping me busy. Property is something I’m quite keen to get into in the UK. I’m invested in South Africa, but it’s something that I’d like to do here as well. It’s been pretty insightful and has made the days not boring and more productive.

Young George Cox, who made Hove his garden

Cox was a Sussex stalwart, whose best innings came against the toughest opposition

Paul Edwards23-Jun-2020The simplicity of George Cox’s career is not misleading in the slightest. Rather it suggests a deep attachment to Sussex and Sussex cricketers which lasted more or less from Cox’s birth in Wernham in 1911 until his death in Burgess Hill in 1985.He was a good enough batsman for his many supporters at Hove to talk up his England prospects, but as things turned out he played all but seven of his 455 first-class game for Sussex and scored all his fifty centuries for his much beloved county. Those other matches were festival encounters and five of them took place at either Eastbourne or Hastings.So much, so unremarkable, you might say. After all, Cox made his debut in 1931 and played his final County Championship game in 1960. It was an era in which cricketers were expected to stay local and show loyalty. But Cox took things further: after a stint helping Hubert Doggart with Winchester’s first eleven, he returned to Sussex as coach and later as president of the county’s Junior Cricket Festival and its Cricket Society. He skippered the second team when well in his fifties and even led the side against Middlesex when three months short of his sixtieth birthday. He sat on committees; he spoke at dinners whenever he was asked. And even now, the story is nothing like complete.For there are the little matters of the poem, the Memorial Service and the Garden.The poem “A Cricketer in Retirement” begins as follows:

Alan Ross published only ten poems about cricket. Six of them focused quite directly on Test players such as Walter Hammond, Len Hutton, David Gower and Richie Benaud. Another considered an 1852 engraving of Alfred Mynn, “the Lion of Kent”, who died 16 years before England lost to Australia at Melbourne. But the Sussex cricketers of the 1930s were Ross’s “First and Last Gods” and his bond to them never wavered.ALSO READ: This Cox is a Pippin (1961)After the war Cox became a friend whose glorious hospitality he would enjoy at his farm on the edge of Ditchling Common, where they would talk of the Sussex cricketers they both knew. They would recall the county’s famous kinships and shake their heads at the team’s skittish form:

“A Cricketer in Retirement”: was one of the readings chosen for Cox’s Memorial Service, which took place at Hove Parish Church on May 7, 1985. It was read by Johnny Barclay, then the Sussex captain, and it followed an address given by Dennis Silk, the Warden of Radley College. Silk began with a series of images those attending the service would know well:”George was a man of Sussex, with cricket in his blood and a gift with people of all ages that I have never seen equalled. Wherever he went there was sure to be laughter, a feeling of mellow well-being and a mischievous sense of fun. Crowds sat up in their deckchairs at Hove and the Saffrons when George walked to the wicket. When his turn came to speak after dinner there would be a ripple of excitement, whether it was at The Hilton or in Ditchling Village Hall.”But Silk knew very well that Cox had struggled in his early seasons at Sussex, not managing a fifty until nearly two years after his debut and only making his first century, 162 against Hampshire at Southampton, in 1935. Another two summers were to pass before Cox could be sure of his place in the Sussex team but his 1891 first-class runs in 1937 included four hundreds. He then scored at least a thousand runs in every peacetime season until his effective retirement from first-team cricket in 1955.

“George Cox was a lovely cricketer – in many ways he personified summer days at Hove.”John Woodcock

“Not many cricketers gave more pleasure to more people than did George,” said Silk “and most of his finest innings were played against the toughest opposition: Yorkshire before the War, Surrey after it… He could be downcast by failure. Which cricketer isn’t? But he had all these emotions under control, though he used to say with whimsical wistfulness that there wasn’t a county ground in England in the lavatory of which he had not cried his eyes out having made nought.”Gradually the tears would give way to shy smiles and raised bats at Hove, Eastbourne and Hastings. Cox’s batting flourished and his fielding at cover point revealed the athleticism that had once enabled him to play professional football for Arsenal, Fulham and Luton Town. He would make four hundreds against Lancashire and take another six centuries off the powerful Yorkshire attack. The pick of the latter was probably his 198 in 200 minutes in the final county match before World War Two ended Championship cricket for over six years. However, Cox had to share the top score in Sussex’s second innings; he and Harry Parks both made nine as the home side were bowled out for 33 on a wet pitch. Hedley Verity took 7 for 9 in the last first-class match of his life.Cox passes on some tips to the Nawab of Pataudi, then 16 years old•PA Images via Getty ImagesThe runs continued to flow for Cox in the first peacetime summers. Yet again there was talk of an England cap as delicacy and nous were added to power and yielded 2369 runs in 1950 when he turned 39. Yet journalists noticed that while the best teams brought the best from him, struggling sides were often presented with his wicket. “Indulgently negligent against parachuting spinners,” wrote Ross of the batsman whose 754 first-class innings included 98 noughts. “I cannot think of anyone who was as good a player as he who seemed to lose form for such long periods,” added David Sheppard in in 1964. Some 21 years later it would be the Right Reverend Sheppard, Bishop of Liverpool, who would conduct that memorial service at Hove.”In many ways he was my closest friend in cricket, and I learned a great deal from him, not only about the technique of the game, but about the whole approach to it,” he had written. “If cricket wasn’t fun you felt George would have no part in it. He has always been intensely interested in people and their problems. He used to go regularly to coach in South Africa and it was he who first started me thinking seriously about problems there.”It is a mistake to judge the deceased by the presence of good people at their funerals or memorial services. Obligation frequently trumps everything and some thorough skullduggers have been given virtue-scented send-offs. With George Cox, however, it was the real thing. There was a bishop, a headmaster, a duchess, a bevy of writers and a fine collection of establishment figures at Hove that day, but also the villagers for whom Cox had always made time and who now took a final opportunity to make time for him.The cricketers remembered the batsman and the rather useful bowler of slow-medium floaters who frequently apologised to batsmen he had dismissed. His father, Old George, had taken 1843 first-class wickets, most of them in cricket’s first golden age. Young George managed 192 victims and might have taken more had he approached the business more seriously. Yet he was ever the professional who played like an amateur. “He could have bowled respectable medium pace as well,” said John Woodcock. “George Cox was a lovely cricketer – in many ways he personified summer days at Hove.”And so a garden seemed – and seems – a fitting memorial to a player that most of those attending a match at Hove today will never have met, let alone seen walk out to bat, his cap set at a permanently rakish angle. Originally it was a spacious affair from which members of the Cricket Society could watch a game and hold their Annual Party. But when land was needed for the indoor nets in 2002 the garden was reduced to a narrow rectangle – some call it a corridor – wedged between the outdoor and indoor practice facilities deep in the north-west corner of the ground.It is easy to miss. The more fanciful might suggest it is like platform nine-and-three-quarters in the Harry Potter books; one doesn’t see it unless one has been inducted into the gentle magic that informs Sussex cricket. Yet there is no more tranquil place on the circuit than Young George’s garden. The foliage is sometimes so abundant that on quiet days you could sit on the bench at the far end and not be aware you were near a cricket field at all. Cox, of course, might be rather amazed that anyone has sought to commemorate his life in this way. For him it was always Sussex, and whether he was playing, coaching or speaking that devotion remained gently absolute, woven into his personality like Wealden wool in a fine suit. Odd Men In

The coffee wars are going to create latte problems for Australia

Trouble is brewing and the strongest shall win

Alan Gardner14-Sep-2020You may well have heard of the ongoing “culture wars” dividing modern society (basically just a glorified term for the actions of certain men who want to play computer games without being told to tidy their rooms) – but news has reached the Light Roller this month of a far more serious rift. The normally carefree troupe of globetrotting hipsters known as the Australia cricket team has split into rival factions based around their preferences for coffee.Clearly, dealing with life in the biosecure bubble while on their tour of England has taken a toll. Discussing the situation in an emotional, socially distanced interview, Kane Richardson spilled the beans (organic, hand-picked) on the group’s descent into caffeine-fuelled nihilism, hitting out at diminutive legspinner and haircut wearer Adam Zampa for being a “coffee snob” who had never extended him an invite to the famous Love Café.(As watchers of will know, the Love Café was founded in response to the crisis that engulfed Australian cricket following the 2018 sandpaper affair. Zampa and Marcus Stoinis are the designated “rare units” who front the operation, with the goal of fostering a more caring, sharing environment within the national team. There is also an aim to teach Stoinis how to play legspin but they haven’t got round to that part yet.)Richardson revealed that he has taken to patronising the newly established outlet of batsman-barista David Warner, adding warmly that “to me it all tastes the same”. Marnus Labuschagne has also tried to claim a slice of the market with what connoisseurs describe as a homespun brew that looks a bit funny but gets the job done – though given he is only open for business when not batting in the nets (or throwing for Steven Smith in the nets), success is believed to have been limited.Furthermore, rumours that Smith was considering switching to coffee from tea, in a move that could help unite the warring parties, have been dismissed by well-placed sources who point out that he could never betray his preference for exotic leaves.While captain Aaron Finch has so far managed to maintain appearances of elite mateship, mainly by overseeing a series of team-bonding latte art sessions, there are fears more serious cultural issues may once again be percolating through the Australian system. Dressing-room feuds such Warne v Waugh or Katich v Clarke are nothing new, but the emergence of this latest beef/vegan-friendly meat substitute could tear the squad apart. What might be the consequences, for instance, of Pat Cummins starting up a cold brew movement, or Glenn Maxwell experimenting with kombucha?Remember, as the old saying goes, a team is only as strong as its weakest pot of vacuum-brewed single-origin fair-trade Sumatran.

****

Australia’s old guard, meanwhile, continue to cherish their status as unappointed moral arbiters of the sport, diligently policing “the line” wherever they go. Ricky Ponting has been quite clear about which line he doesn’t want R Ashwin to cross during the IPL – that is the notional, “spirit of cricket” perimeter beyond which lies the lawless world of running out a non-striker for backing up (NB: completely the Laws). However, it seems after a chat with Ashwin, he has now noticed the actual, physical white line that non-strikers keep sauntering past, too. “I think something has to happen with the laws of the game to make sure batsmen can’t cheat,” said a perplexed Ponting. Quite right, too, Ricky. But what possible solution could there be?

****

From the IPL to the Svenska Cricketförbundet – quite literally, in the case of Jonty Rhodes, who will head for Scandinavia after the completion of his stint with Kings XI Punjab in the UAE. Tempting as it is to make the joke that Sweden is one of the few places whiter than South African cricket, Rhodes has spoken openly in support of transformation and his own experience of privilege growing up – and we wish him great success in helping to establish the game in what looks to be an inhospitable foreign clime. Here’s hoping he is able to assemble a capable team quicker than you can say ubiquitous flat-pack furniture manufacturer and is back at an ICC event in the very near future, leading a bunch of tall, chiselled Nordic types who are all absolute guns in the field. Just don’t ask questions about how they will handle the knockout rounds.

Ajinkya Rahane is brave, smart, calm, and he has the respect of his team

His contributions were central in ensuring India didn’t crumble in Melbourne like they might well have done

Ian Chappell03-Jan-2021It was no surprise that Ajinkya Rahane captained India flawlessly at the MCG; anyone who saw him in charge in Dharamsala in 2017 would have recognised a man born to lead cricket teams.There were a lot of similarities between that 2017 match and the one at the MCG. Firstly it was between the same two highly competitive rivals, then there was the valuable first-innings lower-order contribution from Ravindra Jadeja, and finally Rahane aggressively accumulating the required runs in a nervy pursuit of a moderate victory total.Related

Rahane on bouncing back from 36 all out: 'We need to back our basics'

Rahane builds his legacy by staying in the moment

Ajinkya Rahane's India wrap up famous Boxing Day victory

Kohli is 'in your face', Rahane 'calm and composed' – Shastri

The moment that caught my attention in the Dharamsala match was the time Rahane called on debutant left-arm wristspinner Kuldeep Yadav when David Warner and Steve Smith were involved in a century partnership. “This is a brave move,” I thought, and it turned out to be a very smart one. Yadav quickly claimed the wicket of Warner – expertly caught by Rahane at first slip – and this prompted a five-wicket slide.That’s part of Rahane’s success as a skipper: he’s brave and smart. However, there’s much more to his leadership than just those two important qualities. He is calm when things could easily get out of hand. He has earned the respect of his team-mates, one of the most important aspects of good captaincy. And he gets runs when they are needed, which adds to the respect his team has for him.India knew they would be missing the highly valued skills of Virat Kohli following the first Test. Adding to the weight on Rahane’s shoulders, they suffered an abysmal collapse in Adelaide. As if that wasn’t enough, Rahane was responsible for Kohli’s run-out in the first innings in that game, when India were easing into a dominant position.Despite all those deflating factors, India strode onto the MCG a week later – after Tim Paine had won the toss – as though they were leading 1-0. In part that was because they were aware the Australian opening partnership was in turmoil. They also knew that one man couldn’t replicate the supreme deeds of Kohli and it was going to take an extra effort from all concerned to overcome his absence. And finally, there was the captain they greatly respected; they wanted to play well for Rahane.4:58

Ajinkya Rahane – from the sidelines to the centre

And boy, didn’t they do that. There was Jasprit Bumrah, excelling as usual at the MCG, ambushing batsmen regularly. R Ashwin, with his new-found confidence in Australian conditions, exerted his influence over Smith, a vital early wicket that further boosted India’s confidence. Inspired by the seniors, the debutants, Shubman Gill and Mohammed Siraj, made significant contributions as they adjusted quickly to Australian conditions.Despite those valuable performances, the one that turned the match firmly in India’s favour was the Johnny Mullagh medal-winning contribution from Rahane. The captain’s century came at a time when India could easily have faded to a two-nil deficit, and it was this performance that gave his team the conviction that victory was attainable.A former resident of Mumbai told me his wife lip-read Rahane say the words “Come on, India,” when he reached his MCG century. That is another thing that defines Rahane’s captaincy: he’s all about the team.At a time when aggressive, proactive international captaincy is in short supply, India are fortunate to have two leaders who both understand the value of taking wickets over containing the opposition.This tantalising series is far from over. India still have concerns with yet another fast-bowling injury and an opening batsman in a quandary. However, despite coming off a disastrous collapse in Adelaide, along with the departure of their best batsman and the loss of two leading fast bowlers, India have fewer selection headaches than Australia.It’s helpful that they have a strong, calm leader and a vibrant spirit that has built up under the Kohli-Rahane-Ravi Shastri coalition.If India do go on to repeat their last tour’s success in Australia, the Mullagh medal won’t be the only gong Rahane receives.

Unhappy encore for Australia's top-order batsmen

On day one at the MCG, the Australians looked little better technically or tactically than they had in the uncertain summer of 2018-19

Daniel Brettig26-Dec-2020Perhaps it was the euphoria of bowling India out for 36. Perhaps it was the false impression created by a quick and comfortable fourth-innings chase of fewer than 100 to win that same sunny Adelaide afternoon. Or, perhaps, it was the confidence built up by last summer’s clean sweep of Pakistan and New Zealand, a confidence that looks increasingly misplaced.Australia entered Boxing Day at the MCG with very little sense of foreboding about what might occur should they bat first on another pitch that featured a liberal covering of grass to ensure it would not be too hostile to bowlers.Joe Burns groped, wafted and strained at Jasprit Bumrah before nicking one behind•Getty ImagesIn fact, Australia were so confident that Joe Burns’ second-innings 50 at Adelaide Oval had righted the numerous wrongs of the first innings, that Steven Smith’s rapid demise at the hands of R Ashwin was a blip, and that Matthew Wade, Marnus Labuschagne, Travis Head and Cameron Green were all set for big innings, that the captain Tim Paine chose very happily to bat first on an MCG pitch that had 11mm of grass and early morning moisture.In fairness to Paine, there was plenty of history backing this decision. Since the dramatic first day of the 2010 Ashes Test in Melbourne, when England sent Ricky Ponting’s team in and promptly razed them for 98 to set up the retention of the urn, the average first-innings score was in the region of 389: more than enough, one would think, against an Indian side now minus Virat Kohli.But the evidence presented by Australia’s top six in front of a socially distanced MCG crowd of 27,615 offered rather more unsettling conclusions for Australia’s planners and selectors. Confronted, for the second time in as many Tests, with a sensibly marshalled bowling attack on a pitch that required hard graft rather than heavy hitting, the Australians looked little better in a technical or tactical sense than they had done during the uncertain summer of 2018-19.Related

  • Marnus Labuschagne laments 'innocuous dismissals' of set batsmen

  • Who is Mohammed Siraj and how did he earn a Test debut?

  • Shubman Gill – from U-19s to a Test debut at the MCG

That this could be true with Smith present again was still more worrying for the hosts, who are now faced with the fact that, apart from his pair of stirring SCG centuries in the opening ODIs, Smith is playing much more like he did during a halting IPL campaign than at any stage of his otherworldly 2019 Ashes series in England.Believe it or not, Smith is now closing in on three full years without making a century in a Test match in Australia, the sort of figure that many would refuse to believe without actually consulting the calendar. Last summer, New Zealand constrained his scoring rate with short stuff from Neil Wagner; this time around, the wily Ashwin is continuing to build on some early uncertainties created when they crossed paths in the aforementioned IPL.By playing around neatly with lengths and paces on a highly disciplined, even slightly defensive, line of middle and off stumps, Ashwin has found Smith’s outside and inside edged in consecutive innings for the combined tally of just one run. He found enough purchase in Melbourne to achieve similar things against Paine, after Wade had gifted his wicket to Ashwin with an unsightly smear before lunch – the sort of shot selection that no career opener would have sat comfortably with.That Wade would have sallied forth in such a manner indicated a measure of overconfidence, a sense that may have arrived through the contrast in how he handled the opening exchanges when lined up against Burns, who groped, wafted and strained at Jasprit Bumrah over the course of ten torturous deliveries.Marnus Labuschagne got himself close to a major score again•Getty ImagesBurns had, at least, survived more than the single ball he managed against Trent Boult this day last year, but it was clear that the problems he has experienced so far this summer at all levels were not to be eradicated by a fourth innings cameo against a crestfallen India in Adelaide, after the game had been effectively decided.For a time, the best hope Australia had of a substantial first-innings score was carried through by Labuschagne and Head, who in a stand worth 86 vital runs either side of the lunch break demonstrated that a good degree of application, with the odd aggressive stroke thrown in, could bring about the results Australia desired.During this period, Rahane came close to looking like he was short of ideas, particularly after Bumrah was not called upon until midway through the afternoon session for reasons that were not entirely clear. Labuschagne left as many balls as he could, often on length, and was twice fortunate to have lbw shouts rebuked by ball-tracing on the grounds of height.His back leg will show a bruise or three from balls that thudded into it with the bat clearly raised, but the proof of Labuschagne’s judgment is in the fact he has got closer to a major score in each first innings than any other member of the home side’s top six.Contrast this with Head, who while playing soundly for the most part remains keener than most Test batsmen to feel the thud of the ball on the bat. Head leaves only around 15% of deliveries bowled to him, as against 29% for Labuschagne and 24% for Smith. It’s a set of numbers that could not be forgotten when, after his post-lunch sabbatical, Bumrah angled in from around the wicket to coax an edge and the breakthrough. Head’s average against balls whirring in at him from this point of release is around the 25-mark, and it was a surprise India did not opt for it sooner.Labuschagne’s handy occupation, and a shorter one from the sophomore Cameron Green, were then to be ended by the spiky, speedy work of the 26-year-old Mohammed Siraj, who deputised grandly for Mohammed Shami with spells of pace and direction. Labuschagne leaned too far across his stumps to avoid flicking a straight ball to leg gully – for once mimicking Smith in a fashion he would rather have avoided – and Green’s immobile front leg presented Siraj with too clear a target for an lbw verdict. And 124 for 3 quickly became 155 for 7, the advantage very much lost.R Ashwin takes off on a celebratory run after dismissing Steven Smith•Getty ImagesOne of the features of this match are a series of tributes for the late, great Dean Jones. His wife and daughters were accompanied to the middle by Allan Border during the tea break to place Jones’ baggy green cap, Kookaburra bat and groundbreaking sunglasses by the stumps. Both Jones and Border were part of one of Australia’s least happy Boxing Days of all, when they were bowled out by England for 141 in 1986 to set up an innings defeat. Undue haste had, at times, been a feature on both that day and this one.Watching all this, the coach Justin Langer would have ruefully recalled his pre-match words, which featured plenty of confidence but also included the truism of Test match first innings: big ones win games consistently, and anything else will leave a side scrambling for freakish things like the third afternoon in Adelaide.”If we’re going to become a great team we have to get better at winning after we win and people didn’t quite understand that, but really good teams keep winning and winning, particularly when they’re playing good cricket,” Langer said. “So it’s an area we’ve addressed, we’ll have to start well Boxing Day morning and then be consistent, because we know India will fight back as we saw in the first two days of the Test match in Adelaide.”We know that in first innings in Australia we are looking to score 400 in the first innings – there is no surprise there, that’s what we’ve based our best Test cricket on for years. So, when I said we have got areas where we can improve, that’s one I am talking about. We play our best cricket, as we saw all last summer, when we are scoring big first-innings totals, that’s what we aspire to and what we will be aspiring too in this game as well.”But having been fortunate to watch everything click for the pacemen in Adelaide at precisely the right moment, the Australians were only good enough to improve on their halting first innings of the series by the measly matter of four runs. Asking any bowling attack, even one as good as Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Nathan Lyon, to pull consecutive Tests out of the mire is more than any international top order should expect.India, as it happened, ended the day on 36 again. This time, though, for the loss of just one wicket. Reality was starting to catch up.

Stats: Kyle Mayers bags the highest fourth-innings score in Asia

ESPNcricinfo brings you all the records that Mayers and West Indies broke during their historic chase

Gaurav Sundararaman07-Feb-2021West Indies created history at Chattogram by recording the highest ever chase in Asia thanks to a double-century on debut by Kyle Mayers. Here are some records that West Indies and Mayers broke during this chase.ESPNcricinfo Ltd 0 Previous Instances of teams successfully chasing a target of 395 or more in Asia in the fourth innings of a Test . The previous highest chase was by Sri Lanka when they chased 391 against Zimbabwe in Colombo in 2017. This is only the fifth instance of any visiting team chasing a score in excess of 300 in Asia. This is also the fifth highest chase in the history of Test cricket and second highest for West Indies.Related

  • Mayers' knock brings father Shirley Clarke to tears

  • History-making Mayers looking for more and more glory

  • At no point did I think we would lose the game – Mominul Haque

  • Kyle Mayers: 'I hope this inspires all youngsters to work hard'

  • A bolt from the blue – Kyle Mayers takes Test cricket by storm

216 Runs added by Nkrumah Bonner and Kyle Mayers in the fourth innings. This is only the second time two debutants have added more than 200 runs in this history of Test cricket. The only pair to have added more runs were Khalid Ibadulla and Abdul Kadir when they added 249 against Australia in Karachi in 1964. It has been 55 years since a pair of debutants added 200 or more. The 216 runs added is also the second highest for any pair in the fourth innings in Asia.ESPNcricinfo Ltd5 Previous instances before Kyle Mayers for a player to score a double-century on his Test debut. Only one other player from West Indies has achieved this feat – Lawrence Rowe when he scored 214 in 1972 against New Zealand. Mayers’ unbeaten 210 was also by far the highest score by a debutant in the fourth innings of a Test. Only eight players have achieved this feat before. The highest score before Mayers belonged to Abbas Ali Baig when he scored 112 against England at Manchester in 1959.ESPNcricinfo Ltd 6 Instances of batsmen scoring a double-hundred in the fourth innings of a Test. Mayers joins an elite list of cricketers with this feat. George Headley’s 223 in 1930 against England still remains the highest score in the fourth innings of a Test but Mayers joins Gordon Greenidge as the only other player to score a double in a winning cause. Both players were unbeaten. The unbeaten 210 by Mayers is also the highest fourth innings score in Asia going past the unbeaten 171 by Younis Khan against Sri Lanka in Pallekelle in 2015.ESPNcricinfo Ltd 2 Instances of players scoring a double-century batting at any position lower than four in the fourth innings. Nathan Astle’s 222 against England was the only score higher than Mayers’ unbeaten 210. Incidentally, the highest score before Mayers’ for West Indies at No.5 or lower was Brian Lara when he scored an epic unbeaten 153 to help beat Australia at Bridgetown, Barbados in 1999. Since the start of 2019 there have been four instances in which a left-handed batsmen playing at No.5 has helped his team chase a 300-plus score in the fourth innings. 7 Sixes hit by Mayers in his debut innings. Only Tim Southee has hit more sixes than Mayers on debut in Test cricket. 53% Contribution by Mayers in the fourth-innings chase – Third highest contribution for any batsmen in wins chasing 300 or above. Gordon Greenidge and Mark Butcher are the only ones to have contributed more.

England endure home discomfort as New Zealand raise the required standard

Onus on learning new tricks for foreign climes leaves unbeaten record in jeopardy

George Dobell11-Jun-2021It’s been seven years since England lost a Test series at home but, over the next few days in Birmingham, they face a real fight to retain their record.England have been pushed a few times in recent years. But whether it’s been India or Australia or West Indies or Pakistan who have threatened that record, England have tended, when push came to shove, to revert to home advantage.What does that mean? It’s tended to mean producing surfaces which encourage their strength in seam bowling and their experience in both using and facing the Dukes ball. Think, for examples, of the Lord’s Test against India in 2018 or the Trent Bridge and Edgbaston Tests against Australia in 2015.There’s nothing wrong with that. Pretty much every team uses home advantage. You could argue it wouldn’t be particularly sensible to do anything else.Joe Root has his hands on his head as New Zealand pile on the runs•Getty ImagesBut, in an effort to develop from a side that is good at home to a side that can claim to be the best in the world, England are testing themselves in more benign conditions. They have requested good batting tracks for this series – for the entire summer, actually – in the hope their batters can gain the skills required to bat long and their bowlers can demonstrate the adaptability required to thrive when the going gets tough.There’s nothing wrong with that, either. England have had some excellent wins both home and away in recent years. But, against the best three sides – India, Australia and New Zealand – they have won just one of the 26 away Tests they have played since the start of 2013. Chris Silverwood, the head coach, has admirable ambitions to improve that record.On the evidence of this series to date they have some way to go. New Zealand had the best of the first Test at Lord’s and, going into the third day at Edgbaston, are again in the stronger position. Bearing in mind that they made six changes to their team for this game – most of those changes designed to keep first-choice players fresh for the World Test Championship final – then most of the evidence suggests they are the stronger side. It’s not hard to see how New Zealand have qualified for the World Test Championship final, especially now that Devon Conway has filled one of the few holes they had.After a day (well, 76.3 overs) on which England’s bowlers claimed only three wickets, it’s probably natural that the focus will be on the attack. And it’s true, they struggled (at least until the ball was changed after 42 overs) to find the swing enjoyed by New Zealand. But the second day has been the best time to bat at Edgbaston for a long time and, in truth, you suspect England’s first innings was anything up to 100 runs short of par.The bowlers were a bit unlucky, too. For a start, Joe Root put down a relatively straightforward chance at slip off Olly Stone to reprieve Will Young on 7. They were probably a little unfortunate with an umpiring decision which went Conway’s way when he had scored 22; the umpires uncertain whether an edge had carried to Zak Crawley in the slips. And maybe a more confident keeper than James Bracey would have been a yard closer to the bat and been able to take the edge offered by Young on 40. Stuart Broad was the unfortunate bowler on both the latter occasions.Olly Stone was unlucky with a dropped catch by Root, but conceded his runs at 3.86 an over•Getty ImagesIt’s true that Jack Leach’s spin would have been useful. Even if he hadn’t gained much assistance, he would probably have provided more control than Stone (who has gone for 3.86 an over so far) and he would have helped ensure they avoided more over-rate fines. England, you may recall, lost 40 percent of their match fee because of their slow over-rate at Lord’s. Dan Lawrence’s maiden Test wicket right at the end of the day suggested spin could yet play a part of the final three days, too.But the man England really missed was Ben Stokes. With Stokes in the side, England can play the spinner without compromising their seam depth. He strengthens their batting, too, and provides a sense of belief in the field which can drag his side through tough sessions. He’s been masking holes elsewhere in the side for some time.”Yes, we want to play on good pitches; we want to challenge our fast bowlers to take wickets on good pitches,” Jon Lewis, the England bowling coach, agreed afterwards. “We have to find a way to be effective on these pitches, whether that’s using short balls to upset the batsmen or bowling tight lines and making it hard to score.”We’ve got to find a way to get wickets on good pitches because that’s what we’re going to have to do throughout the summer and in the winter as well.”It’s a brave policy. And an unusual one. Could Lewis think of another country which doesn’t utilise home advantage?”Australia,” he replied. “They produce really good pitches. They have pace and bounce and they back their fast bowlers to get wickets on them.”That’s the challenge that lies ahead of us. That’s what we’re trying to do here.”Related

Zak Crawley shows England's batting woes in young line-up

New Zealand's wholesale changes show immense strength in depth

Devon Conway and Will Young make it New Zealand's day

As it happened – England vs New Zealand, 2nd Test, Edgbaston, 2nd day

In retrospect, you wonder how wise it was to play Mark Wood in this match. It’s not that he didn’t deserve selection – he bowled really well at Lord’s – but, with just three empty days between games, you wonder if it was worth risking him. He still bowled quickly – though every bit of 10 percent slower than Lord’s – and his batting helped England recover from 175 for 6 to exceed 300. But he wasn’t quite as sharp as he had been at Lord’s. For all his qualities, you suspect he will rarely be at his best in the second of back-to-back Tests.The pitch is, Lewis admitted, a little slower than England would have liked, too. But, after a cold early summer, there’s not a huge amount that could have been done about that and part of England’s development as a Test side has to be their ability to make inroads in conditions where they have little assistance.Broad, at least, was excellent. We have become familiar with his full, probing length over the last couple of years. But what we do not always see is the lateral movement he generated here. He beat the bat often, took two edges that (apparently) didn’t carry and might, with just a little bit of luck, have had several wickets. He did, at least, have the satisfaction of surpassing Courtney Walsh’s Test wickets tally during the day; he did it in fewer overs, too. (We’ll gloss over the fact he’s closing in on his Test ducks record too.)But while Stone bowled some fine deliveries, he wasn’t quite able to sustain the pressure of his senior colleagues. And, with Wood unable to offer the pace variation he had at Lord’s, England had four right-arm seamers separated by about six mph. On flat wickets, against batters who are prepared to put a high price on their wicket, they will have to be even more disciplined and tight if they are to build pressure.And that’s the lesson here. England have come up against a really good side who have shown the standards required to go the extra step and become one of the best couple of teams in the world. This match isn’t over, but that home record looks in more jeopardy than it has for several years.

Harry Brook unleashes full potential to win praise from England 'big dogs'

PCA Young Player of the Year sets sights on higher recognition after breakthrough summer

Matt Roller29-Sep-2021″I think Harry Brook likes the big time. I think he can be big time!” Kevin Pietersen tweeted. “He’s not scared of any situation, he’s not frightened of any bowler and he just sticks to what works for him,” Ben Stokes said. “I don’t think it will be too long before we see him wearing the Three Lions.”Endorsements don’t get much better within English cricket and Harry Brook knows it. “They’re pretty big dogs, aren’t they?” he laughs. “For them to be saying stuff like that and rating me as a cricketer is really good. I’m quite a level-headed person, so I don’t let stuff get to me but… yeah, it’s nice for people to say nice things.”Related

  • Sound Sedbergh schooling underpins Harry Brook's Hundred rise

  • Somerset scattered like seagulls before Brook books in

  • Root wins PCA Player of the Year, Capsey Young Player award

Brook’s breakout summer across formats has invited that praise and ends with him adding his name to the distinguished list of winners of the men’s Young Player of the Year prize at the cinch PCA awards.He made more runs across the T20 Blast and the Hundred than any other English player, averaging 61.36 and striking at 150.33 from the middle order; he came into the season with a first-class average a shade under 25 but finished it as Yorkshire’s second-highest run-scorer in the County Championship.”I wrote a few things down at the start of the season – a few aims for the year, what runs I wanted to get in different formats,” Brook recalls. “I got all them targets so I was very happy with it. I do it every season really, but I think this is the first year I’ve actually hit them goals. It’s just trying to know what a good season is before actually starting it. I think it’s nice to set goals and if you smash them, it’s a really good feeling.”If the numbers alone are impressive, Brook’s style adds to the feeling he is a player with a bright international future ahead of him. Pietersen was particularly impressed by the power he generates from his strong wrists during the Hundred, and while he has shown glimpses of his innovative game – a dinked reverse-paddle off Saqib Mahmood in his 91 not out against Lancashire in the Blast stands out – his power hitting through and over cover sets him apart from his peers.Brook picks out two innings as his favourites of the summer; surprisingly, neither is from the Hundred, where he starred for Northern Superchargers before being ruled out of their final group games after contracting Covid-19. “The Championship hundred against Northants, which was a must-win game for us to get through on a difficult pitch – that was definitely one of them,” he says. “And then I got 83 against Worcester in the T20 when we were right in the dumps – me and Jordan Thompson put on a big partnership. Them two games were probably the highlights of my season.”Brook described his Championship hundred against Northamptonshire as a season highlight•Getty ImagesBrook’s T20 breakthrough was all the more impressive for the fact it came from the middle order. Most young batters in the English game have burst through with the cushion of the Powerplay boosting their strike rates but the vast majority of Brook’s runs came from No. 4 or 5, rotating against spin before cashing in against pace at the death.”This year Galey [Andrew Gale, Yorkshire’s coach] came up to me and said ‘you’re going to bat four or five’ so I went straight into that role and started off quite well. I like coming in after the Powerplay and just knocking it about for a bit – I’ve always been fairly good at rotating the strike.”I used to want to open the batting but I think that’s gone out the window now – I’ve really enjoyed batting in the middle order. Usually you’re still there at the end of the game and if you’re knocking the runs off, you end up getting a not out. It’s a good feeling being able to knock them off for your team.”Test cricket is the pinnacle of cricket still, for me,” he insists. “I definitely want to play Test cricket, [but also] in as many competitions as possible. The IPL is on at the minute and it’s just so good. The standard is ridiculous and when they get crowds back to full, it just looks unbelievable, so I’d really like to play in that – and obviously white-ball for England as well.”As for the winter, Brook has his eye on warmer climes. “I don’t really want to be at Headingley in the rain and the cold, so hopefully I’ll be away somewhere,” he smiles. He has his eye on England Lions’ tour to Australia, Covid restrictions permitting, and has attracted some interest from BBL teams, with Hobart Hurricanes believed to be frontrunners to sign him.If Brook feels like he has the world at his feet, the recent struggles of Tom Banton, his former England Under-19 team-mate who won the PCA award two years ago, provide a note of caution and a reminder to soak in everything that comes his way. “You play a lot better when you’re enjoying it and you’ve got a smile on your face,” he says, “so you do all the hard yards behind the scenes and then enjoy it when you’re on the field.”

Australia's T20 shake-up – who has the most to gain?

The captain and chief selector have indicated there is plenty to play for over the next few weeks

Andrew McGlashan26-Jun-2021Josh PhilippePhilippe, who has been one of the standout players in the BBL over the last two seasons, made his debut on the tour of New Zealand earlier this year. He twice got himself set with promising scores in the 40s – both coming at impressive strike rates too, as he batted at No. 3 – and in the absence of David Warner and Steven Smith for this tour, it seems likely he will get further chances at the top of the order. He did not keep wicket in that series, that role went to Matthew Wade, but if all ten T20Is take place, there could be a chance to see him there. With the logjam for top-order spots, though, he still faces being squeezed out of the final World Cup squad, but with uncertainty over Smith’s elbow, a strong few weeks would come at a good time.Dan ChristianIt would be a terrific story if Christian makes the World Cup. And it now feels like he has a solid chance despite being a last-minute addition to this tour. The area Australia have most struggled to nail down is the middle-order batting positions and national selector Trevor Hohns, captain Aaron Finch and his BBL coach Greg Shipperd have lauded his ability to close innings. Christian was given the option as to whether he wanted to give up his Nottinghamshire T20 deal and go through two weeks’ quarantine ahead of this trip but said it was never in question.Related

Australia's World Cup conundrum: the search for a T20 finisher

'Fearless' Christian ideally suited to Australia's T20 World Cup needs

Opportunity knocks for late World Cup bid amid mass tour absences

Finch refocuses on T20 World Cup build-up despite tour disruptions

Riley MeredithLike Philippe, Meredith got his first chance in New Zealand where he caught the eye with his pace and twice pinned Kane Williamson lbw. He is likely already in the frame for the World Cup but fast bowling is an area Australia are well-served in. However, in the absence of Pat Cummins, Kane Richardson and Jhye Richardson, you would imagine Meredith will have a decent amount of game time to further his case. While Cummins is a certain starter at the World Cup, Meredith has the opportunity to push the two Richardsons given their decision to opt out of the trip.Mitchell SwepsonSwepson was one of the standout bowlers of the last Australian season with white and red ball. He returned to the national side in the T20Is against India where he claimed five wickets in three matches, but was then a victim of bubble life as he spent weeks as a travelling back-up in the Test group. When finally able to play again, he finished the BBL strongly with the Brisbane Heat – forming a legspin pair with Marnus Labuschagne – and then was picked in the Test squad to tour South Africa ahead of the T20I series in New Zealand. However, even if the South Africa trip had gone ahead, he would have been ruled out with a stress fracture in his neck. Now he has the chance to push his white-ball claims again having moved back above Tanveer Sangha in the pecking order. With enlarged squads a possibility for the World Cup, there could be room for three specialist spinners.Josh HazlewoodWhen Hazlewood faced India in Canberra last year, it was just his ninth T20I in more than seven years since making his debut. It’s a format he has never quite found a home in – the metronomic line and length that is such an asset in Tests and one-day cricket perhaps perceived as a weakness (along with Australia’s desire to manage their fast bowlers). He could get a few more chances on this tour to show what he can bring to the T20 side and make a case for inclusion in the World Cup party. But, while T20s are the main focus over the next few weeks, there are also three ODIs in the West Indies with important World Cup qualifying points on offer.

Dig deep, get down and dirty – no one does it better than New Zealand

Delayed gratification comes to those who push on through the suffering – just look at Williamson’s men

Andrew Miller23-Jun-20212:08

Steyn: Southee a different bowler since World Cup 2015

It takes something extreme for BJ Watling to display any anguish on a cricket field, so when, in the crunchy closing stages of a gripping morning session, he stuck out a hand to gather a wayward shy from Kane Williamson and immediately ripped off his gauntlet in a state of mild panic, the omens were instantly grim. Sure enough, the physio, Tommy Simsek, rushed out to manipulate Watling’s dislocated ring finger back into place – a procedure every bit as wince-inducing as the patient made it look – and though he soldiered on to the interval, it was his deputy Tom Blundell who took his place in the team huddle after lunch.Watling, however, is not a man you would want to leave behind in the final battle of a campaign. Even before NZC could amend their tweet confirming the extent of his injury, he had rushed back down the pavilion steps, shunted Blundell back to the margins, and reclaimed his place behind the sticks for the final session of his 75-match, 12-and-a-half-year Test career.Related

  • What we've learnt from cricket's second Covid year

  • Michael Mason, 'emotion and jubilation', and Kane 'not the last man standing' Williamson

  • In Rishabh Pant's defiance lies his defence

  • Not luck, not fluke – New Zealand deserve to be the World Test Champions

  • NZ's latest additions look ready-made for Test cricket

Bravery and foolhardiness are basically one and the same. For this was a day for digging deep, something that this magnificent New Zealand team does better than almost any outfit in the world. One final busting of the gut, an exhortation to cast aside the fripperies of physical injury, and tap instead into the emotional hurt that New Zealand have known only too personally in their last two ICC global finals.Watling was not a part of those dressing-rooms in Melbourne in 2015 or Lord’s four years later. But then nor was Neil Wagner, another man who knows only too well that pain is transient but glory eternal. Against Pakistan in Mount Maunganui in December, Wagner had his boot crushed by a Shaheen Shah Afridi yorker but bowled on through the pain, claiming two wickets in each innings in a bid to stave off a rare defeat.And so it was fitting that such a doughty pair would combine – for one final time in Watling’s immense career – to deliver the breakthrough that truly set New Zealand on their way to glory. In ordinary circumstances, the presence of Ravindra Jadeja at No. 7 might have seemed a place too high; in extraordinary circumstances, such as those that transpired on this pulsating final day – and indeed, in the two sides’ last ICC meeting, at Old Trafford in the World Cup semi-final – he was exactly the sort of brawler to meet the needs of India’s hour.Tommy Simsek manipulated Watling’s dislocated ring finger back into place, a procedure every bit as wince-inducing as the patient made it look•Getty ImagesAnd that hour after lunch was Test cricket at its zenith. A wounded India team, rightly recognising the dangers of becoming becalmed in the third innings – a lesson that England’s final-day defeat in Adelaide 15 years ago has etched into the sport’s lore, exactly as India’s Kolkata miracle in 2001 changed forever teams’ attitudes towards the follow-on. Merely sitting in your foxholes in such circumstances, digging for survival but in truth waiting for the one with your name on it, does a team no favours when the inevitable comes to pass. A counter-attack of some description was mandatory. Scalp a lead, however it may come, and defend it for your life thereafter.And so it came down to that gritty, grotty hour after lunch, as Wagner rumbled in with his dog-eared, 60-over ball, aided and abetted by the high-kicking immensity of Kyle Jamieson at the other end. The pair of them charged with closing India’s routes back to parity while burgling a few breakthroughs to build on New Zealand’s three-wicket morning.The lead was 98, the die was cast, and Watling’s fingers were numb as he all but fumbled Jamieson’s second ball of the session, a glove-thumping lifter that might have been designed to ask the question: “are you you’re still up to this?”. Wagner, inevitably, made it his business to ask the follow-up questions, thundering through the middle of the pitch as Pant – with perfectly ludicrous logic – reversed his stance and rolled his wrists on a pull through third man, the obvious percentage option with a phalanx of leg-side catchers scattered for the conventional top-edge.Jadeja’s part in their 33-run stand – the second-largest of the innings – was muted by his standards but vital, as he willed himself to withstand Wagner’s bombs as New Zealand’s requirement was stretched into 110s. But then he was done in by the fractionally fuller length – the short ball that wasn’t, after all – and with his weight inevitably deep in his crease, Wagner’s exaggerated angle from around the wicket brought the edge into play, and Watling, in the clutch moment, made no error as he nudged ahead of MS Dhoni with his 257th and final Test catch.Watling had begun his fielding stint with a handshake from Virat Kohli after announcing at the start of the tour that this Test would be his last. Ross Taylor, by contrast, chose to wait until the winning moment, his shovelled flick off the toes for four off Mohammed Shami, before turning to his opponents and accepting the respect that was due to one of the mightiest campaigners of them all.But you got the sense, as his formless but indomitable quest for victory grew in stature, that Taylor’s own announcement wouldn’t be so far behind. In a recent interview with the ICC, Taylor admitted that, had the 2019 final not turned out as it did, he might not have had the drive to take his career into this, his 14th year. A farewell on home soil might be tempting, but for New Zealand’s greatest Test run-scorer, stages do not get more fitting than this.Taylor and Williamson share a moment after making New Zealand Test world champions•Getty ImagesAt the other end, throughout his unbeaten 96-run stand for the third wicket, Williamson exuded a level of certainty that no other player came close to matching all Test. Calm and calibrated, his astonishment at being given out lbw on 1 was vindicated by DRS on review. And he barely played another false shot until the ball before his fifty, an ugly hoick that just eluded Jasprit Bumrah’s fingers at third man.Taylor, by contrast, brought little but revolting pugnacity to the table, but it was precisely the mettle that the moment needed. Despite an 80 at Edgbaston that was hewn from a similar rock, he has been as bereft of form on this tour as Nasser Hussain in the latter days of his own guts-for-glory Test career, and he’s quite possibly bowed out with a similarly iconic boundary too. Batting from muscle memory clearly has its advantages at such high-stakes moments.Taylor needed 18 balls to get himself off the mark with a crack through backward point, but he wore his indignities and soaked up the blows, none more savage than the length-ball bouncer from Bumrah that spat into his badge as if launched from a fielding trampoline. Taylor grimaced, then grinned, then got straight back to business after the concussion test. Unmoved and immoveable. And ultimately magnificent.This was a day on which New Zealand weren’t afraid to get down and dirty in their final push for the summit. Small moments of heroism echoed through their day. None more crucial than Henry Nicholls’ ice-cool running catch at backward point, blocking out the cat-calls of another emotionally invested crowd to see off Pant and unlock India’s flimsy lower order. Tom Latham and Devon Conway will not graft many more valuable 33-run stands either, their achievement in reaching tea unscathed was an especially vital statement.But as Williamson hoisted the World Test Championship trophy on an exquisitely sunlit evening in Southampton, the highs and lows of an extraordinary six-day Test suddenly took on a new, more metaphorical meaning – most especially, the importance of keeping your head through the tough times and savouring the glories when they come. Two years ago, at Lord’s, New Zealand’s hopes and dreams were cruelly washed out, just as they had been four years before that in Melbourne. Delayed gratification does eventually come to those who push on through the suffering.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus