Signing Jota would be ‘huge’ for Celtic

Celtic signing Jota on a permanent basis this summer would be ‘huge’ for the club, according to ex-BBC pundit Noel Whelan.

The Lowdown: Jota close to join Celtic permanently

The 23-year-old enjoyed a brilliant season on loan at Parkhead in 2021/22, thrilling Hoops supporters with his quality out wide.

Jota ended up finishing the campaign with 15 goal contributions (seven goals and eight assists) in just 21 Premiership starts, being hailed as ‘unbelievable’ by Ange Postecoglou.

It is widely expected that the winger’s loan move will be made permanent this summer, with a deal hopefully being agreed in the near future. Indeed, Football Scotland reported last week that the Portuguese gem is ‘extremely close’ to sealing a permanent move to Celtic from Benfica.

The Latest: Whelan excited by possible Jota deal

Speaking to Football Insider, Whelan waxed lyrical over Jota, saying that a permanent transfer makes complete sense and would be a significant boon for Celtic.

The 47-year-old stated:

“That would be huge. What an outstanding performer and player. That’s one that the Celtic fans will be licking their lips at. That’s one name they would want straight away back in the club and in the team.

“He was a joy to watch, fantastic and exciting. He fits straight into the methodology of how the manger wants to play.

“If they can’t get that deal done on a permanent then a loan, again, would strengthen Celtic and their push to retain the title next season.”

The Verdict: No-brainer for all parties

It would now be a huge disappointment if Celtic’s permanent move for Jota falls through, considering how much sense it makes for all parties this summer.

Benfica probably can’t promise him regular playing time and they would surely be happy to receive a mooted £6.5m fee for him, whereas the Hoops will see him as a key figure for years to come.

At 23, hopefully this is only the start for Jota, who could end up being one of the next great attacking players to grace Parkhead over a sustained period, assuming there are no late hitches over a possible permanent move.

City sent warning after Silva update

Former BBC pundit Noel Whelan has warned Manchester City not to get rid of Bernardo Silva this summer after they put a huge price tag on the midfield maestro’s head.

The Lowdown: City demand £80m for Silva

The 27-year-old first joined the Premier League champions when he arrived from Monaco back in 2017, and has gone on to become a Sky Blues fan favourite during his five years at the club, making 251 appearances to date.

The midfielder still has three years remaining on his current contract at the Etihad, and it was claimed by the Daily Mirror last week that the club will demand ‘in excess of £80m’ from Barcelona this summer, who want to bring the versatile star to La Liga.

The Latest: Whelan sends City warning

Speaking to Football Insider, Whelan suggested that whilst £80m would be a good value deal for any interested clubs, he strongly believes that Silva could strike up a great partnership with new signing Erling Haaland.

“He’s been one of the most consistent players for Man City in every season since joining. He was close to leaving last summer, but what a revelation he was in the 2021-22 season.

“On his day, he’s just one of these players you can’t defend against.

“£80m doesn’t seem a bad figure from a buyer’s perspective, especially as he has another three or four years of his best football ahead of him.

“I would be really reluctant to sell him if I were Man City.

“You’ve got Erling Haaland coming in who would thrive from having his quality. What’s the point of bringing Haaland in if he’s not going to get the service?”

The Verdict: Valuable creative outlet

With Fernandinho confirmed to be leaving this summer, as well as the uncertainty surrounding the future of Ilkay Gundogan, City need to do everything that they can to keep Silva, who has been a brilliant creative outlet in the middle of the park.

This season, the 70-cap international racked up 13 goals and provided seven assists across all competitions under Pep Guardiola, as per Transfermarkt, and played a huge role in helping the Spaniard get his hands on yet another top-flight trophy.

Whether the Lisbon-born talent will still be a City player come the start of August yet remains to be seen, but we find it very difficult do disagree with Whelan’s assessment.

In other news… another Manchester City first team star could reportedly be tempted by a ‘fresh challenge’ away from the Etihad.

Liverpool trio tipped to leave this summer

Liverpool trio Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Takumi Minamino and Divock Origi will all leave the club this summer, according to Paul Robinson.

The Lowdown: Summer exits expected

Jurgen Klopp is likely to be looking at new signings during the summer transfer window as he looks to take his squad up another level again.

On the flip side, a number of players could also be making their way out of Anfield, with the German perhaps no longer seeing them as an important part of his plans.

Oxlade-Chamberlain, Minamino and Origi all fall into that category, with the latter already set for a move to Serie A champions AC Milan.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-liverpool-transfer-news-34/” title=”Latest Liverpool transfer news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=“none”]

The Latest: Robinson drops exit claim

Speaking to Football Insider, Robinson was firmly of the opinion that all three of those players would move on this summer, following Fabio Carvalho’s arrival at Liverpool.

The Sky Sports pundit said:

“Oxlade-Chamberlain, Minamino and Origi are the three I think will leave. Minamino nearly joined Leeds in January but the deal never went through.

“It sounds like Origi is a done deal. Those three will leave a big whole in Liverpool’s squad. A hole that needs to be filled.

“It is an area they will look to rejuvenate in. That is what Klopp and Guardiola are good at, rejuvenating. That Liverpool squad needs freshening and Carvalho will do that.”

The Verdict: All nailed-on to leave?

It looks highly likely that at least two of the aforementioned players will move on from Liverpool, with Origi already being given an Anfield farewell and Oxlade-Chamberlain completely out of favour, not playing at all since March.

While Minamino will likely depart, he has been a more prominent figure for the Reds, scoring 10 goals this season despite a lack of game-time.

Keeping hold of the Japan international wouldn’t be a bad thing, although if he wants to be a regular starter elsewhere, allowing him to move on would also make perfect sense.

In other news, Liverpool will reportedly listen to offers for one player. Find out who it is here.

Nottingham Forest interested in Luke Turner

Nottingham Forest are hopeful they can be successful in their pursuit of Premier League football next season and are already looking at new additions to strengthen their already great squad.

What’s the latest?

According to the Aberdeen manager, Jim Goodwin, Luke Turner will be made available to leave the club this summer following interest from Nottingham Forest.

He said: “We’ve spoken to Luke and his representatives.

“We felt it was right just to give him the opportunity to go and find something a bit more permanent somewhere else.”

The Daily Record reported on Monday night that an offer of a trial had been made for the defender to prove his worth to the Midlands club.

Cooper will love him

The addition of another youngster in the squad would surely be something Forest manager Steve Cooper would love to see especially when you consider how well so many of the young players in the team are excelling under his management.

Brennan Johnson, James Garner and Djed Spence are three young players who have been integral to Forest’s successes in securing a spot in the  Championship play-off places this season, however, both Spence and Garner are on loan so bringing in new rising talents would be advantageous to the club.

The 6 foot 1 Aberdeen defender has been attracting attention from Nottingham Forest despite not making a single appearance for his Scottish club, but this season he has been on loan to Northern Irish side Cliftonville and is in impressive form making 43 appearances and scoring two goals.

Turner was hailed an “outstanding young talent” by journalist Josh Bunting and was recently dubbed a “revelation” by Cliftonville manager Paddy McLaughlin.

The manager said (via Belfast Live): “Since the day Luke came in the door, he has been a revelation.

“He has put in big performances and he has been really consistent.

“It’s difficult sometimes for young players to be consistently good every week, but he has been a really consistent performer for us at 19 years of age.”

It wouldn’t be the first time Forest has signed a defender from the SPFL club, with Scott McKenna joining from Aberdeen. Now, Turner could follow in his footsteps.

AND in other news: Cooper set for 1st Forest disaster on “outstanding” £20m gem who’s “easy on the eye”

An opportunity to keep the Afghanistan-Pakistan rivalry dignified

In the way of a second India-Pakistan fixture stands a rivalry that comes with its own history; but it is not completely untenable yet

Sidharth Monga28-Jun-2019It might be difficult to believe for outsiders, but there are many cricket fans in India and Pakistan who find the cricket matches between the two sides unbearable. It brings with it vulgar jingoism and ill will; outside the actual cricket, it is just an ugly spectacle. Pakistan’s late surge on the back of a lifeline handed to them by Sri Lanka’s stunning win over England has made a second India-Pakistan match a distinct possibility. If India do Pakistan a favour by beating England this Sunday, they will likely top the table and Pakistan could enter the semi-final at No. 4, setting up a semi-final clash at Old Trafford.Pakistan still need a couple – even one can do – of other results to go their way, but also have to win their two remaining games. In the way of another match marred by jingoism, then, stands a match that comes with its own unpleasantness. On Saturday, Pakistan will go up against their other neighbours Afghanistan. As a cricket rivalry, it is still in its infancy. The two sides have faced each other only four times in international cricket. The truth, though, is that it would never have needed on-field action for this rivalry to generate needle.The ingredients are all there. Unlike India and Pakistan, they were not the same country, but they were never different either. The Durand Line, the border between the two countries, was drawn up in 1893 to restrict Afghanistan’s influence in British India, and Britain’s in Afghanistan. As far as borders go, it is one of the more porous. Refugees and drugs and terror and America’s influence have travelled unchecked through this border until it was tightened in 2017.Just like with the two Punjabs that the 1947 partition gave us, people either side of the Durand Line have more in common with each other than with some people within their own country. It has divided people that were Pashtun well before they were Afghans or Pakistani or Indian. When USSR invaded Afghanistan, the Pashtun people found refuge in Peshawar. Selling nuts in Pakistan and coming back with cotton fabric was a legitimate business for Afghans – and vice versa for Pakistanis – until recently. Afghanistan captain Gulbadin Naib’s family had been in that business even before Pakistan existed. Naib didn’t know till he was 11 that he was from Afghanistan because he grew up a refugee in Pakistan. Almost every family has relations on the other side of the border.Fans of the India and Pakistan teams flocked with flags and banners•Associated PressThe translation of all this into a sporting rivalry began when Afghan kids found cricket in Pakistan. And it happened when cricket in Pakistan was at its peak: from the late 1980s to the late 1990s. Most members of the current national team of Afghanistan learnt their cricket in Pakistan. Mohammad Nabi, Asghar Afghan and Rashid Khan all played for Wajahatullah Wasti’s club, Islamia, in Peshawar. For its part, the PCB played a big role in the development of these cricketers – including letting them play in its domestic tournaments – and also cricket in Afghanistan.The break-up began when India’s government felt the need to strengthen ties with Afghanistan to keep in check China’s influence, which comes via Pakistan. Cricket was but a vehicle for this charm diplomacy. In the mid-2010s, grants, permission to use Indian grounds as their home venue, and a Test debut against India all reached Afghanistan pretty swiftly. It helped the Indian government that the BCCI was under a ruling party member of parliament’s control now; previous board chief N Srinivasan is known to have resisted similar advances from the Afghanistan Cricket Board.This cricket co-operation from India came at an obvious cost: culling of ties with Pakistan. For many flaws of the PCB, even the ICC felt this was an ideal and organic model of how a full member could help an associate member of the ICC. Now, though, the Afghan players were asked to stop living and playing in Pakistan; they were even stopped from giving Pakistan too much credit for their development as cricketers or talking about their time in Pakistan. They don’t even speak Urdu in press conferences anymore.This has infuriated Pakistan. Every time Rashid – especially him – gives credit to India or speaks well of India, message boards and social media go abuzz. In a tense Asia Cup game last year, Rashid wagged his finger in the general direction of the dismissed Pakistan batsman Asif Ali. This was a red rag. Here was a man who wanted to be like Shahid Afridi but had now ditched his celebration and wagged a finger at a Pakistan batsman. Stories began to emerge of how he still held a house in Pakistan, and how he had a Pakistan ID. As if celebrating success against Pakistan is a sign of ingratitude. As if they were refugees in Pakistan out of their own will and Pakistan had nothing to do with the situation.No player or PCB member says it, but they feel “betrayed” palpably by the “ingrates”. There were signs of schadenfreude when ACB’s acting CEO Asadullah Khan, tongue-in-cheek, offered Pakistan help last week as they struggled for results, claiming in a TV interview that Afghanistan were both better at cricket, and had better technical resources. The CEO before him said last year that they had received more assistance from India than from Pakistan. It is a complicated situation as it is; add politics to it, and this is recipe for nastiness to attach itself with the cricket.On the field, though, just like between India and Pakistan, things don’t get ugly; or no uglier than in, say, India-Australia matches. In the match that Rashid angered so many Pakistan fans with his celebration, Afghanistan came close to beating the stronger and more-fancied team.Shoaib Malik had to dig deep to help Pakistan win in the last over, but Pakistan were quick to console the crestfallen Afghan players. In Pakistan’s pre-match press conference at this World Cup, Haris Sohail was told about the comments made by the ACB CEO, and he laughed it off. When Naib was asked if there would be extra tension in the match, he actually said he hoped cricket could be used to mend relations between the two countries. The match on Saturday is a good opportunity to prevent these contests from going down the India-Pakistan way.

The audacious Mr Kohli

Plays of the day from the first ODI between India and England in Pune

Alan Gardner15-Jan-2017The review
One less-explored conspiracy theory about MS Dhoni giving up the India limited-overs captaincy is that he didn’t want to deal with the hassle of DRS. India accepted the system for England’s tour, beginning with the Tests, and that made this the first bilateral ODI series in the country to feature reviews. Only one per innings is on offer in this format but Jason Roy was glad for it after being given out lbw by umpire CK Nandan when he had 18 to his name; while the ball was shown to have struck him in line with leg stump, Hawk-Eye projected that it would have missed by a good margin.The review II
Dhoni went on to demonstrate he was plenty au fait with the technology when Eoin Morgan was given not out by Nandan on 28. Dhoni had collected what he recognised was a thin edge off Hardik Pandya’s bowling, Morgan trying to run the ball off the face, and threw the ball up in celebration only to see the umpire unmoved. Pandya had also begun to celebrate and, as Virat Kohli rushed in to consult with his players, Dhoni immediately signalled for the review. Kohli did not hesitate in taking his predecessor’s direction and moments later Nandan was overturning another decision.The direct hit
England had got off to a useful start, mainly thanks to Roy’s aggression. His opening partner, Alex Hales, was content to take his time – but he took a little too much when responding to a call for a second run in the seventh over. Roy had turned the ball towards deep square leg and was intent on coming back for two but Hales stopped momentarily at the striker’s end. That gave Jasprit Bumrah, who had sprinted up from fine leg, the tiniest window through which to defenestrate Hales, who realised the danger but could not beat a direct hit (though a full-length dive might have helped). The stumps were obscured from both sides, by Kohli and umpire Nandan, but the zing bails helped confirm that Hales only had his bat the line, not over.The drop that didn’t matter
Bumrah fared less well delivering the ball over 22 yards and he sent down three high no-balls, the last of which might have cost him the wicket of Ben Stokes – if it had been caught. Swinging for the fences during the death overs, Stokes got a big top edge that flew towards Hardik Pandya coming in from long-off. Pandya left the catch to Kohli running back, which was a much harder take and he dropped it over his head, with Pandya unable to take the rebound either. But the umpire’s outstretched hand told them the effort was for nothing. Bumrah was able to continue bowling, though, as none of the no-balls was considered dangerous by the umpires.The six
England cleared the ropes 11 times in their innings but none had quite the same stamp of authority as Kohli’s first. India were 15 for 1 in the opening Powerplay and Kohli had faced three legitimate deliveries when he skipped out to David Willey and hammered a cross-batted stroke several rows back into the stands at wide long-on. The report of the bat told you how clean the hit was and the noise immediately rose by several decibels as the ball was swallowed by a sea of blue.The six II
Having reached his hundred (with a six), Kohli pulled out an even more extraordinary shot. Chris Woakes might have thought his back-of-a-length slower ball would be difficult to hit – and most batsmen might have settled for a paddled single. Kohli is not most batsmen, however, and he simply drew himself up and extended the arms through a lofted drive over long-on. Never mind playing the shot, it was difficult even to conceive.The silence
KL Rahul had struck one impressive back-foot force off Willey but he was undone in the same over that Kohli had turned the volume up. Stepping out to drive down the ground, he left enough of a gap between bat and pad for Willey to bring the ball in with the angle from round the wicket and flatten middle stump. The stadium fell silent as Willey, who had gone four ODIs without taking a wicket, celebrated his second in as many overs.

My favourite Mitch moment

Few cricketers thrilled the crowd as Mitchell Johnson did. Fans write in about the many feats of a seriously quick bowler

ESPNcricinfo staff17-Nov-2015Benjamin Bishop
When Mitchell Johnson smashed a six into the commentary box window in Harare, then seeing it boarded up for the rest of the game!Timothy Haskett
Mitch is on fire at the Adelaide Oval, he’s just taken a wicket and the Aussie crowd smells blood. Stuart Broad walks out to boos and hisses, and then spends 10 minutes getting a bolt on the sight screen covered because it was shining in his peripheral vision. They find a sheet to cover the bolt but the time delay has made the crowd and Mitch angrier. He steams in, bowls a 155kph thunderbolt towards Broad’s previously broken toe, he flinches his leg away and it BOWLS HIM!!! Mitch gets another Ashes wicket, that’s two in two balls, and the crowd goes wild.Richard Henderson
I was there, in the stand, on the edge of my seat at Adelaide Oval on the third day when Mitch Johnson destroyed England in the space of three overs. I remember tweeting about how it would poetic justice if Mitch bowled Stuart Broad for a duck after he wasted all that time with the sight screen, and sure enough…Mitch Johnson, what a legend.Yashovardhan Diwan
It was the middle of the night (I go to uni in America) when Mitch bowled Alastair Cook in Adelaide 2013. I was watching in the common room of my dorm so as not to keep up my roommate with incessant shouting. It might have been the best ball I’ve ever seen- swinging in and cutting out to clip top of off (might’ve re watched it approx 35725283 times since).While celebrating the wicket I broke the door of my dorm common room and proceeded to blame it on a girl for the rest of the year. Absolutely worth. Love Mitch. Love the mo. And Adelaide was the best of his best. Best cricket I ever watched and probably ever will.Karthik Malhotra
It was against India when the Aussies came here in 2009 it was 4th ODI in Guwahati when he was bowling the first over of the match. It was a day game and in winter so it was quite foggy and he got hit for six off the very first ball by Virender Sehwag. But by the end of the over he claimed both Viru and Gautam Gambhir. The special part was he bowled them both, by generating a lot of pace.Hylton Forge
My favourite Mitchell Johnson moment – 2nd test at Kingsmead in Durban in 2009. On a juicy, lively wicket he whipped out Neil McKenzie for a duck with the third ball of South Africa’s first innings closely followed by Hashim Amla two balls later. As if that wasn’t enough he then sent Graeme Smith to hospital in the next over with a broken finger and Australia went on to win by 175 runs. The most devastating and hostile spell of fast bowling that I’d witnessed and I’ve seen Mike Procter, Malcolm Marshall, Michael Holding, Allan Donald, Dennis Lillee and many others in their prime.As a South African fan maybe it wasn’t a favourite moment but still mesmerising to watch.Mitch wasn’t just about raw pace though•Getty ImagesJames Giugni
So many magic moments – but how about when he softened Pujara up with some chin music before producing a slower cutter that took the Indian’s off-bail?! Raw aggression followed by pure class.Stephen Jurd
My number 1 Mitch moment is at the SCG against South Africa when at the fall of the ninth wicket out comes a brave Graeme Smith with a broken finger to try to hang on for a draw. Smith did amazingly well, but on Day 5, with the shadows lengthening, Mitch was able to deliver a 146kmh delivery which cut about 15 degrees (off a crack) to take Smith’s off stump. Unplayable. Farewell Mitch, the best parks cricketer ever.Simon DavisAussie tour of SA 2014. We went to Centurion to watch the first Test. It was all Johnson. He cowed the crowd as well as his opponents. 12 for 127! He broke Philanders bat and hit Amla and McLaren in the head. The sheer aggressiveness of his bowling, combined with pace and accuracy left SA with no answers and the crowd with no voice. It was quite something to watch even if it was painful for a SA supporter. But Johnson was mercurial, we didn’t think he could do it again. In the 2nd Test in PE, South Africa destroyed Australia and we felt vindicated that this was a once off. Off to Newlands and Mitch did it again with 7 wickets. It went down to the last hour, with AB and Faf and Vernon keeping them out, dropping their hands to bouncers and getting mauled. It got mean and tense with Steyn and Clarke, and it felt like the whole Australian team was riding Johnson’s menace. Best series I’ve ever watched live, even though we lost. Thanks Mitch!Rajkumar Pujari
Mitch Johnson’s four wickets against India in Kuala Lumpur. That’s when he burst on to the scene. Sachin was in peak form that series, was class apart from rest of the Indian batsmen, Australia scored only 240-odd, other Aussie bowlers didn’t have much impact. Mitch picked up four of the five wickets that fell before rain washed out the match. The other one was a run-out. I was listening to the match as a 13-year-old on a radio lurking in the corner of study room in my school hostel. I still remember it as if it were yesterday. The name Mitchell Johnson was etched in my memory since then.Welcome to Australia, Virat!•Getty ImagesSurya KR
My favourite Mitchell Johnson moment was against India in 2014-15 series, where the first ball he delivered to Virat Kohli hit him on the helmet and he didn’t sledge or give those crazy stares. Instead he went up to Kohli to ask him whether he was fine.Mohammad Ihsan
In the last Pakistan-Australia series at Abu Dhabi, it was a real hot day, many fans were sitting in the general stands and Mitchell Johnson was fielding near the long-on boundary. A box of cold water was near him, when a fan asked for water Johnson threw him a bottle and then another asked as the weather was too hot, and so on, until he was fielding there he was supplying cold water to the fans. It was very generous of him.Hari Prathap
For me, it has to be IPL final 2013. The making of MJ, the beast.. Well, atleast for England.He broke down one of the best IPL batting teams with his sheer pace.Anish Kumar
In the 2009 Champions Trophy, he made a 47-ball 73 after Australia were reduced to 171 for 7 against an inexperienced West Indies team.James Shaw
Best MJ moment has to be his duck at the SCG in the 2010-11 Ashes. As an Englishman sat in the barmy army it was the best atmosphere I’ve experienced in a cricket ground.Hamish
Being from NZ my favourite Mitch Johnson moment is him retiring!!

South Africa's worst collapse, 6 for 21

A stats review at the end of the tri-series game between Zimbabwe and South Africa

Bishen Jeswant29-Aug-20140 Number of times that Zimbabwe have beaten South Africa at home. They have beaten South Africa twice, at Chelmsford in 1999 and at Durban in 2000. Zimbabwe have played ODIs against 14 teams at home, and have won at least one ODI against 12 of them, with South Africa and Australia being the exceptions.2 Number of hat-tricks that have been taken by Zimbabwean bowlers in ODI cricket. The only hat-trick taken prior to that by Prosper Utseya today was by Eddo Brandes against England in 1997. Also, there are now two hat-tricks that have been taken against South Africa in ODI cricket, the only previous one being Lasith Malinga’s famous four-in-four-balls at Guyana during the 2007 World Cup.1 Number of times that a Zimbabwean bowler has taken a five-wicket haul against South Africa in ODI cricket. Prosper Utseya is the first. In all, Zimbabwean bowlers have taken 16 five-fors in ODI cricket, with Brian Vitori, Paul Strang, Henry Olonga and Eddo Brandes being the only bowlers to take more than one – they have taken two each.21 Number of runs for which South Africa lost their first six wickets. They were 142-0 before collapsing to 163-6. This is their worst collapse for the first six wickets in an innings. The fewest runs that they scored for any six wickets in an innings is eight – this happened twice, against India and Pakistan, both times for the last six wickets.7 Number of times that Zimbabwe have been bowled out for 170 or less in an ODI while chasing against South Africa, the most against any team. Zimbabwe have been bowled out for less than 170 on 15 occasions against Sri Lanka, whether batting first or second, more than against any other team for Zimbabwe.8 Number of runs scored by South Africa’s batsmen from No. 4 to No. 7. This is the fewest runs scored by any four players batting in these positions for South Africa in a single ODI innings. Today’s performance included the first instance of South Africa’s No. 4 and No. 5 batsmen scoring ducks in the same match.5 Number of Zimbabwe’s top-seven batsmen who scored at least 20 runs each today. This was only the second time that at least five of Zimbabwe’s top-seven batsmen have done this against South Africa, but unfortunately ended up on the losing side both times.

The case against Howard

In the end, whether Howard does or doesn’t get the job–the fact is that there are many, many people better suited to the job

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013
The nomination of John Howard is an act of severe short-sightedness© Getty Images
Gideon Haigh has made himself a name for writing spanking pieces taking apart moral and economic flaws in the cricket fraternity. Unfortunately, his case for John Howard wasn’t one of them. It’s a fine piece in its own right, filled with Haigh’s typical bafflement at the hypocrisies and short-sightedness of some of the world’s most vocal bodies–yet it fails, I’m afraid, to make a case for the much-maligned Howard.First of all, let’s get the prerequisites out. What Howard was as prime minister of Australia really doesn’t matter; the way and pattern he went about his work does, as that is what will be transferred to the ICC should he become vice-president or president. What he said or didn’t say about Murali doesn’t matter, either; it’s his personal view, and though it may be mind-numbingly frustrating for some fans (myself included) to have to continually beat a dead horse every time Murali grabs a seven-for, Howard is entitled to his opinion.Nor is the fact that he can’t bowl to save his life of any consequence–mere knowledge and awareness of his responsibilities as an ICC official should suffice, and he is at least academically aware of cricket norms.Indeed, it can be argued that his outsider rank is a strength and not a weakness, seeing as it removes a significant chip from his shoulder. But the fact remains that he is in no way qualified whatsoever for the job either. Those who attacked him as a racist or politician were indulging in ad hominem, trying to break their opponent’s case by attacking his character instead of the issues at hand.The temptation to expose their hypocrisy must have taken over, but instead of presenting a case for Howard’s candidature Mr Haigh only attacked the double standards of the opponents; the subtitle to his piece, saying that Howard’s opponents “are not exactly shining examples of rectitude themselves”, signifies as much.The fact is that there is a broadly divided view on Howard, and most of it is, unfortunately, not positive. To overcome that Howard would have to be a shining example of level-headed diplomacy, firmness and cool–yet his chuntering, in-your-face manner while leading his country suggests otherwise. His regular forays into the world of cricket went beyond endearing–that was a John Major, or a Robert Menzies–to simply tasteless. He is, unfortunately, seen in some parts of the cricket world as a divisive influence.The fact is that from all the wonderfully capable administrators who surely must exist in the Anzac realm–that capable former NZC administrator, Sir John Anderson, springs immediately to mind–choosing Howard, whatever the hypocrisy of the nay-sayers, was almost mind-blowingly short-sighted. You may as well have appointed George W Bush head of FIFA–he may be a hell of a nice guy personally and his politics may have nothing to do with his views on the sport, but the fact is that people don’t like him.To overcome that he would have to be a genius at management–and that, unfortunately, is not evident either. Howard would have to change his public image dramatically–and serenading India, unfortunately, won’t be enough. Indeed it is a sign that instead of standing up for the Anzac divide, Howard may just end up pandering to the hulking Indian board. In the end, whether Howard does or doesn’t get the job–the fact is that there are many, many people better suited to the job, and the nomination is an act of severe short-sightedness.

'Every Shield game should aim to go late into day four'

The states need to look at producing pitches conducive to four-day cricket, and ensuring that younger players have mentors to turn to, says Queensland captain James Hopes

Daniel Brettig25-Jul-2011Across the past decade Queensland has seen the departure of its greatest and most successful generation of cricketers, a drop in results, intrigue and unrest at management and coaching levels, and the first sprouts of hope for a better future. Sound familiar?The parallels between Queensland Cricket and Cricket Australia are numerous. The state enjoyed its happiest era around the same time that the Australian team was laying waste to most of the rest of world cricket. Players like Matthew Hayden, Michael Kasprowicz, Andy Bichel, Stuart Law, Jimmy Maher and Martin Love were valuable to Australia but integral to the Bulls, allowing the team to add five Sheffield Shield titles to the first, celebrated so wildly in 1995.Much as the Australian team did for their first 18 months after the retirements of Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath in 2007, the Bulls teams who immediately followed their greater forebears were able to use the confidence of past battles to bluff and bluster to victory, but the results have ebbed away in more recent times. The captain, James Hopes, believes the expectations of both Queensland and Australia must, for now, be kept within realistic parameters.”I think Queensland may have overachieved when we did win a couple of one-day titles with individual performances that got us over the line,” Hopes told ESPNcricinfo. “Some guys had come through, players like Chris Simpson and myself had come through playing under winning teams.”So we still had a bit of an expectation that we were going to win, and I think that stood us in pretty good stead. But then we started to lose players like Clinton Perren, who were good players in those teams and were leading players. When we started to lose that next rung down from the Jimmy Mahers, that was when we started to struggle, and we realised we had to rebuild.Replacing “some of the greatest players to walk around Australian first-class cricket” was never going to be easy. “There has to be a slow process of identifying a couple of young players and giving them opportunities at the right time,” Hopes said. “And I think we’ve done that.The likes of Chris Lynn and Luke Feldman were given a chance and stood up to the mark. “And then we saw Joe Burns, who we identified at Queensland two years ago, but we didn’t rush anything. We gave him a go when we thought he was ready to play, and I think we saw that when he did play he was absolutely ready for first-class cricket.”I think that’s the trick – when you do lose a group of senior players, don’t panic. Understand there’s got to be a process, you’ve got to identify the right people, and then on top of that, play them at the right time. We’ve started to get that right the last 12 months or so, and at the moment our squad is looking pretty strong.”In the middle of that period the Bulls had to negotiate a most unsightly coaching changeover. Trevor Barsby, the former opening batsman, was summarily dismissed – though the board tried to encourage the impression it was his decision – so that Darren Lehmann, the Twenty20 coach, could be installed. Hopes was non-committal about the episode, saying Barsby was a good coach and he had learned much from him about batting, but could also see the positive of Lehmann’s influence.”I was captain and the first I knew about Trevor Barsby going was when I was called into a board meeting along with four other senior players,” Hopes said. “So if that was there, I didn’t know anything about it and the guys who did have a problem kept it quiet, because we were working okay and starting to play okay. But the board felt it was time to go in a different direction and that’s what they did.”Darren is getting through to young players. They seem to understand him when he’s talking about the game […] they’re turning themselves into players that are starting to learn about the game and to understand their own game a bit more.”Having been jettisoned from the national squad (“I would’ve been stupid or naïve to think that if changes were going to be made I wasn’t going to be one of them,” he said), Hopes has resolved to guide the next generation in Queensland through the closing seasons of his career. It is a path he is adamant must be followed by more senior players in other states, lest a crop of players currently being pushed towards national duty lose all avenues for guidance.”Every state needs a few players around who have been through it all before, who know what’s going on and when young guys are going through tough times there are proper sounding boards. That’s where Lehmann’s so good as well. He’s been through the whole process of it and he knows what to say to young guys, when they’re playing, about selection.”I’d like to think that I’m getting into that category now. I’ve been around long enough and been left out of teams and put in teams, so I know what’s going on. I think it’d be a sad state of affairs if Australian cricket just tried to turn every competition played into ones where only guys under the age of 25 are playing.”The reversion of the Futures League second XI competition to a more organic four-day format, with age restrictions relaxed – teams may now choose six players over the age of 23 rather than three – will help to maintain a greater balance. Hopes appreciates that CA had seen the error of its ways, but still remains miffed about why it had changed in the first place.”I think the Futures League was a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to six Australian greats retiring all in the space of two years,” he said. “We could’ve picked a pretty handy generation of players in club cricket who have missed out on playing that level now, and they’re probably a bit old to start.”We picked a guy called Andrew Robinson to open the batting, and he could have played three or four years of that. But now he’s playing Shield cricket based on club cricket, and we would’ve loved to give him some cricket in between, but we could only play three or four over-23s.Hopes said it was important to trust the states to bring in young talent. “The system didn’t let us down for 20 years and we just changed it because we wanted a bunch of kids to come through and try to replace the Haydens and [Justin] Langers, and that’s an impossible task. You’re not going to replace greats of the game with greats of the game.Queensland factfile

Captain James Hopes
Coach Darren Lehmann
Where they’ve finished in the Sheffield Shield since 2001-02 first, second, second, second, first, fifth, last, second, second, third
Australia Test debutants since 2001 Martin Love, Andrew Symonds, Shane Watson, Mitchell Johnson, Ryan Harris
Slipped through the cracks
Clinton Perren A Sheffield Shield batting stalwart who, James Hopes believes, could have been rather more: “I would’ve loved to have seen what he’d have done for Australia, but he just had little form dips at the wrong time”
Aaron Nye Set batting records in Queensland club cricket but was never able to make himself comfortable in first-class company. “You got a few opportunities and if you didn’t nail them they’d move on,” Hopes said. “He was a lot more talented than his record suggests.”
Grant Sullivan “If you saw him at 19 you’d have bet your house on him playing for Australia,” Hopes said of this pacy, muscular bowler. “He was in the same mould as Mitchell Johnson, and it was a bit of a disappointment that injuries cut him down short of what he could’ve done.”
Future Fund
Chris Lynn An exceptional first-class record so far has been allied to limited exposure to Australia A and other CA development teams. Hopes believes Lynn has been made to earn his success so far, standing him in excellent stead. “He will play for Australia and will do it in the next two years or so. And the pleasing thing about that is that he’s going to do it on the back of scoring Shield runs and scoring big Shield runs. I’m happy he hasn’t been rushed.”
Joe Burns Identified early by Queensland cricket but made to force his way into the state team, Burns showed at the end of last summer that he had composure, technique and plenty of shots. Hopes: “We gave him a go when we thought he was ready to play and I think we saw that when he did play he was absolutely ready for first-class cricket.”
Cameron Brimblecombe A young offspin bowler, not yet part of Queensland’s full squad, but handily blessed with natural attributes for his craft. “You’ll be hearing his name a lot in the next 12-15 months,” Hopes said. “He’s exceptional, he’s got a lot of natural talent that enables him to bowl offspin, he’s tall, he’s got big hands, and he’s going to be a star I think.”

“They have to come through the same process those guys came through, and I think that was gotten away from a little bit. But CA have identified that now and are back closer to the track with the six and six. I think six and six is about what it would normally be. You normally have six players under 23 in a second XI team, and six players who you want to give some cricket to.”If one of those six guys is a senior guy coming back from injury, it gives those younger guys a chance to play four days with them and learn a bit about the game and learn what it’s all about. It is very important now that our younger guys just don’t expect it to be given to them, and that they have to start working hard to reap the rewards of playing for Australia.”Critical to the rigorous education of young cricketers, Hopes believes, is a departure from the growing trend towards result wickets. Southern states will snigger at the sight of the Queensland captain saying all Shield matches should be played deep into day four, but Hopes argues that it is the only way for proper development to take place.”We play on some green wickets up here […] if we play early-season games at the Gabba, the wickets are going to be green because the AFL’s just got off them and we get a bit of rain that time of year. But I think everything being equal, every Shield game should aim to go late into day four – that should be the aim of all the states.”Then you’re going to have guys having to bat for a long time, fast bowlers having to bowl long spells, and you’re going to get spinners having a say in the outcome of the game. If we can get to that stage there’s going to be no issues about what’s coming through in Australian cricket, because the players are going to be playing hard games in hard conditions.”Don’t produce wickets that give results to take you to a Shield final, produce wickets that you’re going to play four-day games on, so young players get used to playing four-day games. So when they do play Test cricket, they don’t expect these things to be over in three days.Perhaps Hopes’ most resonant argument, within the broader theme of healthy development, is about unearthing spinners. Like Simon Katich before him, he said the treatment of Australian slow bowlers had been unsatisfactory, cycling through too many bowlers without giving them adequate chances, and then discarding Nathan Hauritz after he had returned more than respectable figures everywhere but in India.”The whole search for the next Shane Warne, let’s give up the search, that’s not going to happen. Let’s let some guy come through and be his own person,” Hopes said. “I thought Nathan Hauritz filled a pretty good role for Australia and he did the best he could. Now we’re looking for the next guy to come through. Hopefully we let that guy develop his own reputation instead of trying to make the next Shane Warne, which I think is going to have to wait for a few years.Hopes said to produce new spinners and develop the current ones, it was enough to ensure that Futures League was a four-day tournament and to encourage states to produce wickets that last four days in Shield cricket. “A spinner is going to come through in the next few years and he’s going to be winning games for his state, then he’s going to turn up to play for Australia and going to expect to win the game for them. That’s the way you develop players. You don’t develop them by picking them and hoping they do what Shane Warne did, because it’s just not going to happen.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus